<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.encosia.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Encosia</title>
	
	<link>http://encosia.com</link>
	<description>ASP.NET and AJAX code, ideas, and examples.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.encosia.com/EncosiaComments" /><feedburner:info uri="encosiacomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>EncosiaComments</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Comment on Why PhoneGap 1.1.0 broke jQuery Mobile’s back button by Stephen Bennett</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/o6zJcsWdsHw/</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=1197#comment-69944</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this info Dave. I'm using PhoneGap 1.5 and it looks likes there still issues with JQM's navigation model. For example JQM dialogs do not close. The PhoneGap JavaScript library appears to have change to the extent that the fix you presented no longer applies. Would you have an update on this issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this info Dave. I&#8217;m using PhoneGap 1.5 and it looks likes there still issues with JQM&#8217;s navigation model. For example JQM dialogs do not close. The PhoneGap JavaScript library appears to have change to the extent that the fix you presented no longer applies. Would you have an update on this issue?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/o6zJcsWdsHw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/why-phonegap-1-1-0-broke-jquery-mobiles-back-button/#comment-69944</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 reasons why you should let Google host jQuery for you by Michael</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/DaXrcjHg7eo/</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=740#comment-69905</guid>
		<description>It's always good to fall back to the local copy if for some reason Google's CDN cannot be accessed. &lt;strong&gt;yepnope&lt;/b&gt; is good for this:

&lt;pre lang="javascript"&gt;      // Load the jQuery library
      yepnope([
      {

        // Load the jQuery library from Google's AJAX API CDN
        load: '//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js',

        // Determine if the local copy of the jQuery library needs to be loaded
        callback: function()
        {

          // If the jQuery library could not be loaded then load the local copy
          if (!window.jQuery)
          {
            yepnope('/includes/js/jquery.1-7-2.js');
          }

        }

      }
      ]);&lt;/pre&gt;

You can download it from http://yepnopejs.com/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always good to fall back to the local copy if for some reason Google&#8217;s CDN cannot be accessed. <strong>yepnope is good for this:</p>

<div class="wp_syntax"><div class="code"><pre class="javascript" style="font-family:monospace;">      <span style="color: #006600; font-style: italic;">// Load the jQuery library</span>
      yepnope<span style="color: #009900;">&#40;</span><span style="color: #009900;">&#91;</span>
      <span style="color: #009900;">&#123;</span>
&nbsp;
        <span style="color: #006600; font-style: italic;">// Load the jQuery library from Google's AJAX API CDN</span>
        load<span style="color: #339933;">:</span> <span style="color: #3366CC;">'//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js'</span><span style="color: #339933;">,</span>
&nbsp;
        <span style="color: #006600; font-style: italic;">// Determine if the local copy of the jQuery library needs to be loaded</span>
        callback<span style="color: #339933;">:</span> <span style="color: #003366; font-weight: bold;">function</span><span style="color: #009900;">&#40;</span><span style="color: #009900;">&#41;</span>
        <span style="color: #009900;">&#123;</span>
&nbsp;
          <span style="color: #006600; font-style: italic;">// If the jQuery library could not be loaded then load the local copy</span>
          <span style="color: #000066; font-weight: bold;">if</span> <span style="color: #009900;">&#40;</span><span style="color: #339933;">!</span>window.<span style="color: #660066;">jQuery</span><span style="color: #009900;">&#41;</span>
          <span style="color: #009900;">&#123;</span>
            yepnope<span style="color: #009900;">&#40;</span><span style="color: #3366CC;">'/includes/js/jquery.1-7-2.js'</span><span style="color: #009900;">&#41;</span><span style="color: #339933;">;</span>
          <span style="color: #009900;">&#125;</span>
&nbsp;
        <span style="color: #009900;">&#125;</span>
&nbsp;
      <span style="color: #009900;">&#125;</span>
      <span style="color: #009900;">&#93;</span><span style="color: #009900;">&#41;</span><span style="color: #339933;">;</span></pre></div></div>

<p>You can download it from <a href="http://yepnopejs.com/" rel="nofollow">http://yepnopejs.com/</a>.</strong></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/DaXrcjHg7eo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/3-reasons-why-you-should-let-google-host-jquery-for-you/#comment-69905</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 reasons why you should let Google host jQuery for you by How to: AJAX Contact Form Using jQuery | Crafted by David</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/KKbUgCY_n-g/</link>
		<dc:creator>How to: AJAX Contact Form Using jQuery | Crafted by David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=740#comment-69735</guid>
		<description>[...] generally use Google to host my jQuery – if you’re wondering why take a look at ‘3 reasons why you should let Google host jQuery for you‘ by Dave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] generally use Google to host my jQuery &#8211; if you&#8217;re wondering why take a look at &#8216;3 reasons why you should let Google host jQuery for you&#8216; by Dave [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/KKbUgCY_n-g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/3-reasons-why-you-should-let-google-host-jquery-for-you/#comment-69735</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET web services mistake: manual JSON serialization by Dave Ward</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/Jj3TI7D5zUA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=1106#comment-69708</guid>
		<description>The reason you're getting the extra, escaped double quotes in the JSON is because that post makes exactly the double-serialization mistake that this post is about. Using JavaScriptSerializer (and the corresponding client-side &lt;code&gt;eval()&lt;/code&gt;) manually is not necessary. To avoid that, you should be able to set the method's return value to &lt;code&gt;string[][]&lt;/code&gt; and return &lt;code&gt;JaggedArray&lt;/code&gt; directly.

As for why the data is not key/value pairs, that's because the method is returning a representation of a DataTable's rows, not a Dictionary of column names and values. You would need to use a different data access approach to change that. Something that pulls the data out into a &lt;code&gt;Dictionary&lt;string, object&gt;&lt;/code&gt;, or similar. Rob Conery's &lt;a href="https://github.com/robconery/massive" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Massive&lt;/a&gt; is an example of that approach (not sure if it works with MySQL though).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason you&#8217;re getting the extra, escaped double quotes in the JSON is because that post makes exactly the double-serialization mistake that this post is about. Using JavaScriptSerializer (and the corresponding client-side <code>eval()</code>) manually is not necessary. To avoid that, you should be able to set the method&#8217;s return value to <code>string[][]</code> and return <code>JaggedArray</code> directly.</p>
<p>As for why the data is not key/value pairs, that&#8217;s because the method is returning a representation of a DataTable&#8217;s rows, not a Dictionary of column names and values. You would need to use a different data access approach to change that. Something that pulls the data out into a <code>Dictionary<string , object></string></code>, or similar. Rob Conery&#8217;s <a href="https://github.com/robconery/massive" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Massive</a> is an example of that approach (not sure if it works with MySQL though).</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/Jj3TI7D5zUA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/asp-net-web-services-mistake-manual-json-serialization/#comment-69708</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why do ASP.NET AJAX page methods have to be static? by Dave Ward</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/huNGyn12lg8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=72#comment-69705</guid>
		<description>You can't. That's basically the point of this post. The advantage of page methods is that they can be fast and light weight since they're not encumbered by ViewState and the page life cycle. But, that also means an instance of the Page and its child controls never exists during the page method's execution.

If you absolutely must have access to a WebControl during the AJAX request, you'll need to use something like an UpdatePanel instead. Just keep in mind that you'll be trading away significant performance for that convenience. If at all possible, figure out a way to work around that need by passing the dropdown's client-side value as a parameter to the page method and/or setting the dropdown's selected value on the client-side based on the result of the page method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t. That&#8217;s basically the point of this post. The advantage of page methods is that they can be fast and light weight since they&#8217;re not encumbered by ViewState and the page life cycle. But, that also means an instance of the Page and its child controls never exists during the page method&#8217;s execution.</p>
<p>If you absolutely must have access to a WebControl during the AJAX request, you&#8217;ll need to use something like an UpdatePanel instead. Just keep in mind that you&#8217;ll be trading away significant performance for that convenience. If at all possible, figure out a way to work around that need by passing the dropdown&#8217;s client-side value as a parameter to the page method and/or setting the dropdown&#8217;s selected value on the client-side based on the result of the page method.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/huNGyn12lg8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/why-do-aspnet-ajax-page-methods-have-to-be-static/#comment-69705</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never worry about ASP.NET AJAX’s .d again by Dave Ward</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/yU_cDYSC0DE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=883#comment-69703</guid>
		<description>That's easy to say now that you're &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; more likely to be primarily targeting browsers that support native &lt;code&gt;JSON.parse&lt;/code&gt;. At the time this was written, native &lt;code&gt;JSON.parse&lt;/code&gt; was a relatively new feature. jQuery itself still used &lt;code&gt;eval()&lt;/code&gt; to deserialize &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; JSON responses at this time, even if the browser did have native &lt;code&gt;JSON.parse&lt;/code&gt; support (in fact, &lt;a href="http://encosia.com/improving-jquery-json-performance-and-security/" rel="nofollow"&gt;my next post on this topic&lt;/a&gt; discussed extending this approach to use native JSON.parse when available).

For that matter, even Crockford's json2.js uses &lt;code&gt;eval()&lt;/code&gt; in its implementation of JSON.parse (after a bit of input sanitizing). There were parse-only implementations floating around, but it turned out to be prohibitively slow in the older JavaScript engines that need JSON.parse polyfilled.

I suppose what I'm saying is that you have to be careful about making blanket statements about &lt;code&gt;eval()&lt;/code&gt;; especially in historical context. "Eval is evil" comes from Crockford, but his own acceptance of &lt;code&gt;eval()&lt;/code&gt; for JSON evaluation played a critical role in JSON being a viable format in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s easy to say now that you&#8217;re <em>much</em> more likely to be primarily targeting browsers that support native <code>JSON.parse</code>. At the time this was written, native <code>JSON.parse</code> was a relatively new feature. jQuery itself still used <code>eval()</code> to deserialize <em>all</em> JSON responses at this time, even if the browser did have native <code>JSON.parse</code> support (in fact, <a href="http://encosia.com/improving-jquery-json-performance-and-security/" rel="nofollow">my next post on this topic</a> discussed extending this approach to use native JSON.parse when available).</p>
<p>For that matter, even Crockford&#8217;s json2.js uses <code>eval()</code> in its implementation of JSON.parse (after a bit of input sanitizing). There were parse-only implementations floating around, but it turned out to be prohibitively slow in the older JavaScript engines that need JSON.parse polyfilled.</p>
<p>I suppose what I&#8217;m saying is that you have to be careful about making blanket statements about <code>eval()</code>; especially in historical context. &#8220;Eval is evil&#8221; comes from Crockford, but his own acceptance of <code>eval()</code> for JSON evaluation played a critical role in JSON being a viable format in the first place.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/yU_cDYSC0DE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/never-worry-about-asp-net-ajaxs-d-again/#comment-69703</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don’t let jQuery’s $(document).ready() slow you down by Don’t let jQuery’s $(document).ready() slow you down « detailfocused</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/LHUjCYfo-O8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Don’t let jQuery’s $(document).ready() slow you down « detailfocused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 23:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=1038#comment-69537</guid>
		<description>[...] http://encosia.com/dont-let-jquerys-document-ready-slow-you-down/ Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://encosia.com/dont-let-jquerys-document-ready-slow-you-down/" rel="nofollow">http://encosia.com/dont-let-jquerys-document-ready-slow-you-down/</a> Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/LHUjCYfo-O8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/dont-let-jquerys-document-ready-slow-you-down/#comment-69537</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 reasons why you should let Google host jQuery for you by Nando Vieira</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/WTvnEpYhSEI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Nando Vieira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=740#comment-69499</guid>
		<description>Definitely not doing wrong, if you decide hosting jQuery yourself. Google CDN takes some time before adding a new release. 

I just prefer having it on my side, compressed, gzipped, and merged with other files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely not doing wrong, if you decide hosting jQuery yourself. Google CDN takes some time before adding a new release. </p>
<p>I just prefer having it on my side, compressed, gzipped, and merged with other files.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/WTvnEpYhSEI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/3-reasons-why-you-should-let-google-host-jquery-for-you/#comment-69499</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 reasons why you should let Google host jQuery for you by Mick Sear</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/4HPQf5aVQpQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Sear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=740#comment-69496</guid>
		<description>I'd generally avoid pulling in JQuery from Google, because I've seen this a lot as well - You see it in the browser status bar: 'Looking up ajax.googleapis.com', etc.  I've seen sites that pull in dependencies from four or five different domains, and each one requires a DNS lookup and then a TCP connection needs to be established.  Unfortunately, although many ISPs offer nice fast bandwidth, they sadly don't offer the same experience with their DNS servers.

Of course, some users will benefit from CDNs, but many users will feel the opposite effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d generally avoid pulling in JQuery from Google, because I&#8217;ve seen this a lot as well &#8211; You see it in the browser status bar: &#8216;Looking up ajax.googleapis.com&#8217;, etc.  I&#8217;ve seen sites that pull in dependencies from four or five different domains, and each one requires a DNS lookup and then a TCP connection needs to be established.  Unfortunately, although many ISPs offer nice fast bandwidth, they sadly don&#8217;t offer the same experience with their DNS servers.</p>
<p>Of course, some users will benefit from CDNs, but many users will feel the opposite effect.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/4HPQf5aVQpQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/3-reasons-why-you-should-let-google-host-jquery-for-you/#comment-69496</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using jQuery to enhance ASP.NET AJAX progress indication by Dorababu</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/XtiXtTeLMpQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorababu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=694#comment-69423</guid>
		<description>How can I apply validation to some of the fields and show the progress if the form is valid only</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I apply validation to some of the fields and show the progress if the form is valid only</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/XtiXtTeLMpQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/using-jquery-to-enhance-aspnet-ajax-progress-indication/#comment-69423</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET web services mistake: manual JSON serialization by Tobias v</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/g1jN5glv7R8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=1106#comment-69345</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave

So many great posts - i think i've read all blogpost about .net/jquery/json.

I'm a noob developer, and pretty confused, think i've used about 4-5 hours trying googling and reading, but i didn't found a solution.

My issue:
I've some data in a mySql db, and i want to provide this data to a phonegap, so i need to use JS in some way, and jquery doing a great job!
But the guide i've used( http://williamsportwebdeveloper.com/cgi/wp/?p=494 ) using  JavaScriptSerializer and it shoudn't, cause as you write the response is:
{"d":"[[\"Tobias Mobil\",\"152\",\"Skid skud \"
and not 
{"d":"[["restaurant_name":"Tobias Mobil","dish_id":"152,"dish_name":"Skid skud"
as it should...
My webservice: http://dagensret.com/GetDishes.asmx/GetDishesByDates

So please help me :) 

I need an example using data from a mySql database.

Thx in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave</p>
<p>So many great posts &#8211; i think i&#8217;ve read all blogpost about .net/jquery/json.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a noob developer, and pretty confused, think i&#8217;ve used about 4-5 hours trying googling and reading, but i didn&#8217;t found a solution.</p>
<p>My issue:<br />
I&#8217;ve some data in a mySql db, and i want to provide this data to a phonegap, so i need to use JS in some way, and jquery doing a great job!<br />
But the guide i&#8217;ve used( <a href="http://williamsportwebdeveloper.com/cgi/wp/?p=494" rel="nofollow">http://williamsportwebdeveloper.com/cgi/wp/?p=494</a> ) using  JavaScriptSerializer and it shoudn&#8217;t, cause as you write the response is:<br />
{&#8220;d&#8221;:&#8221;[[\&#8221;Tobias Mobil\&#8221;,\&#8221;152\&#8221;,\&#8221;Skid skud \&#8221;<br />
and not<br />
{&#8220;d&#8221;:&#8221;[[&#8220;restaurant_name&#8221;:&#8221;Tobias Mobil&#8221;,&#8221;dish_id&#8221;:&#8221;152,&#8221;dish_name&#8221;:&#8221;Skid skud&#8221;<br />
as it should&#8230;<br />
My webservice: <a href="http://dagensret.com/GetDishes.asmx/GetDishesByDates" rel="nofollow">http://dagensret.com/GetDishes.asmx/GetDishesByDates</a></p>
<p>So please help me :) </p>
<p>I need an example using data from a mySql database.</p>
<p>Thx in advance</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/g1jN5glv7R8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/asp-net-web-services-mistake-manual-json-serialization/#comment-69345</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disable a button control during postback. by Jon</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/TAL2ODONhHA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/index.php/2007/04/17/disable-a-button-control-during-postback/#comment-68617</guid>
		<description>My button is inside of an UpdatePanel and everything works flawlessly in Internet Explorer (go figure), but within Firefox the postback never occurs after the button is disabled, even after adding a Postback Trigger on the UpdatePanel for the button. Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My button is inside of an UpdatePanel and everything works flawlessly in Internet Explorer (go figure), but within Firefox the postback never occurs after the button is disabled, even after adding a Postback Trigger on the UpdatePanel for the button. Any suggestions?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/TAL2ODONhHA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/disable-a-button-control-during-postback/#comment-68617</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never worry about ASP.NET AJAX’s .d again by Chris Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/5H1NQqlERLg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=883#comment-68615</guid>
		<description>Use JSON.parse instead of eval everywhere, always.  Encouraging any use of eval promotes bad programming practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use JSON.parse instead of eval everywhere, always.  Encouraging any use of eval promotes bad programming practices.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/5H1NQqlERLg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/never-worry-about-asp-net-ajaxs-d-again/#comment-68615</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on jQuery for the ASP.NET Developer by Safdar Khan</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/Eiq7yjx4Za0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Safdar Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?page_id=1216#comment-68548</guid>
		<description>i am new to jquery, but your blogs helps me alot.Thanks for sharing knowledge with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am new to jquery, but your blogs helps me alot.Thanks for sharing knowledge with us.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/Eiq7yjx4Za0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/jquery-for-the-asp-net-developer/#comment-68548</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why do ASP.NET AJAX page methods have to be static? by Mark Brown</title>
		<link>http://feeds.encosia.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~3/G5u384Hj67Y/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 09:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encosia.com/?p=72#comment-68540</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave

Thanks for your reply!  

I have just quickly tried that out.  One other question, how can I reference a control on the page.  For example, a drop down list as it come up with an error as it's a static method?

Thanks

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave</p>
<p>Thanks for your reply!  </p>
<p>I have just quickly tried that out.  One other question, how can I reference a control on the page.  For example, a drop down list as it come up with an error as it&#8217;s a static method?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Mark</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EncosiaComments/~4/G5u384Hj67Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://encosia.com/why-do-aspnet-ajax-page-methods-have-to-be-static/#comment-68540</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.247 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-16 20:29:50 -->

